bollywood-holywood: rec.arts.movies.local.indian - 8 new messages in 3 topics

rec.arts.movies.local.indian
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en

rec.arts.movies.local.indian@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* UK RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS FORCED TO PROMOTE ABORTION (pro-lie filth) - 3 messages,
2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/dcfc2e198d269895?hl=en
* SUPREME COURT'S SIT FRAMES CHARGES AGAINST TEESTA SETALVAD - 4 messages, 4
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/d0832ece337bc83e?hl=en
* Masti and Movies - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/01eeb08f8f937057?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: UK RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS FORCED TO PROMOTE ABORTION (pro-lie filth)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/dcfc2e198d269895?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Mar 25 2010 9:33 pm
From: rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer)

Dr. Jai Maharaj <usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai> wrote:
>U.K. Religious Schools Forced to Promote Abortion, Homosexuality under Sex-Ed Bill

The usual fear-mongering and hate from the usual pro-liars.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 12:18 pm
From: "regn.pickfod"

Ray Fischer wrote:
> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your hatred is not a good reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth. Your hatred is not a good enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robust social f
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your hatred of homoseuals is obvious.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To you, in your head.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You want to imprison and persecute gays. That is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want the laws changed and I want Homosexuals to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comply with those laws and _not_ go to gaol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You want to imprison and persecute gays. Hiding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behind laws that you want is chickenshit cowardice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The laws were there many years before I was born.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They do not exist now, bigot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have existed and they will exist again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People reject your kind of hate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It isn't hate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You lie in order to justify making people suffer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is hate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I tell the truth to help a known minority suffering a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're a liar and a bigot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Homosexuals are known to have a higher than average
>>>>>>>>>> symptoms of mental disease.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there no sleazy propaganda that you won't wallow in?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you know anything about Homosexuals then you know it is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I know anything about bigots it is that you care nothing for
>>>>>>> the truth. You care only about rationaliziing your insane
>>>>>>> hatred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Homosexuals are Bigots too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Grow up, asshole.
>>>>
>>>> Then you don't know enough about Homosexuals to know the
>>>
>>> Obviously you've done a lot of first-hand research.
>>
>> Holy crap. An admission of the accuracy of my claims.
>
> Guess again, bigot. It's sarcasm.
>
>> Homosexuals are Bigots,
>
> Just like Blacks, Jews, Catholics, Heterosecuals, Women, ...

So Homosexuals care nothing for the truth and care only about
rationalising their insane hatred.?

I think you're being a bit hard on them. Not liking Transgenders,
Bisexuals and such for social `snob` reasons is hardly insane hatred.
From where I come from, anyrate ...

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 1:22 pm
From: rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer)

regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regn.pickfod <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your hatred is not a good reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth. Your hatred is not a good enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robust social f
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your hatred of homoseuals is obvious.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To you, in your head.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You want to imprison and persecute gays. That is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want the laws changed and I want Homosexuals to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comply with those laws and _not_ go to gaol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You want to imprison and persecute gays. Hiding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behind laws that you want is chickenshit cowardice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The laws were there many years before I was born.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They do not exist now, bigot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They have existed and they will exist again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People reject your kind of hate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It isn't hate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You lie in order to justify making people suffer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is hate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tell the truth to help a known minority suffering a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a liar and a bigot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Homosexuals are known to have a higher than average
>>>>>>>>>>> symptoms of mental disease.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there no sleazy propaganda that you won't wallow in?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you know anything about Homosexuals then you know it is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I know anything about bigots it is that you care nothing for
>>>>>>>> the truth. You care only about rationaliziing your insane
>>>>>>>> hatred.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Homosexuals are Bigots too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grow up, asshole.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you don't know enough about Homosexuals to know the
>>>>
>>>> Obviously you've done a lot of first-hand research.
>>>
>>> Holy crap. An admission of the accuracy of my claims.
>>
>> Guess again, bigot. It's sarcasm.
>>
>>> Homosexuals are Bigots,
>>
>> Just like Blacks, Jews, Catholics, Heterosecuals, Women, ...
>
>So Homosexuals care nothing for the truth and care only about
>rationalising their insane hatred.?

No, that's still you.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net

==============================================================================
TOPIC: SUPREME COURT'S SIT FRAMES CHARGES AGAINST TEESTA SETALVAD
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/d0832ece337bc83e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 2:12 pm
From: "harmony"

excuse me, but secualrism is not about, never claimed to be about, never was
intended about, never was about truth, justice or any high moral plane the
media touts for it.
here is my premise: a secularist must always be viewed with suspicion until
his words can be verified indepnedently by the hindus.

<usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
message news:20100316B5fm9i049u8S3bSPlG6T9a5@Pyu35...
> Forwarded article
>
> Thursday, April 16, 2009
>
> Supreme Court's SIT frames charges against Teesta
>
> Supreme Court appointed SIT brings out charges against a leading
> "activist" Teesta Setalvad for "cooking up macabre tales of
> killings", tutoring witnesses, and concocting horror stories. She has
> not only done deep disservice to the victims of the Gujarat riots;
> she has also undermined the credibility of so-called secular
> interlocutors. It confirms the suspicion many have, that often those
> speaking in the name of secularism do not subscribe to the very
> values they claim to be fighting for: truth, justice, impartiality
> and the rule of law. Their secularism is in the service of beating
> down opponents rather than discovering the truth.
>
> "This story should have been a big front page story. It deserves much
> more coverage and discussion", says the reporter.
>
> Read - An Unconscionable Act
> http://www.indianexpress.com/news/an-unconscionable-act/447301/0
>
> Posted by Jayprakash Acharya
>
> End of forwarded article from:
> http://one-news-of-the-day.blogspot.com/2009/04/supreme-courts-sit-frames-charges.html
>
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
>
> o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> educational
> purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may
> not
> have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> fair use of copyrighted works.
> o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> current
> e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> are
> not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the
> article.
>
> FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
> Title
> 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
> included
> information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
> information
> go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> copyright owner.
>
> Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> this post may be reposted several times.

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 3:25 pm
From: koolfireiv

On Mar 17, 6:08 am, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr.
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> Forwarded article
>
> Thursday, April 16, 2009
>
> Supreme Court's SIT frames charges against Teesta

The SIT yet to submit the report as of today,petitions can be filed
alleging anything,has the supreme court taken it on record,considering
the SIT is still investigating,highly unlikely, the supreme court will
bungle like that,based on a petition filed on press reports,and
considering the SIT investigation is not public.

Controversy over false cases

In April 2009, the Times of India ran a story claiming that the
Special Investigation Team (SIT) setup by the Supreme Court of India
to investigate and expediate the Gujarat riot cases had submitted
before the Court that Teesta Setalvad had cooked up cases of violence
to spice up the incidents. The SIT which is headed by former CBI
director, R K Raghavan has said that false witnesses were tutored to
give evidence about imaginary incidents by Teesta Setalvad and other
NGOs.[15] The SIT charged her of "cooking up macabre tales of
killings".[16]

The court was told that 22 witnesses, who had submitted identical
affidavits before various courts relating to riot incidents, were
questioned by SIT and it was found that the witnesses had not actually
witnessed the incidents and they were tutored and the affidavits were
handed over to them by Setalvad.[16]

The report which was brought to the notice of the bench consisting of
Justices Arijit Pasayat, P Sathasivam and Aftab Alam, noted that the
much publicised case of a pregnant Muslim woman Kausar Banu being
gangraped by a mob and foetus being removed with sharp weapons, was
also cooked up and false.[15][17].

A day later, the Times of India published a letter from Citizens for
Justice and Peace claiming that the report in question was not SIT
report but a report by the Gujarat Government.[18]. The author of the
Times article responded saying "My report was based on the SIT report
and not any document circulated by the Gujarat government, as
suggested by CJP. Whether any section of the media has the report or
not is irrelevant as TOI has access to the report.[19]

Dilip D'Souza has picked the loopholes in the initial story carried by
Times of India. D'Souza notes that in his rebuttal to the letter by
Citizens for Justice and Peace, the reporter does not even refer to
the three "widely publicised"incidents he originally claimed the SIT
had found "no truth" in.[20]

A report in the Hindustan Times raised questions about the TOI report.
R.K.Raghavan, the chairman of the SIT criticised the report leakage,
saying, "The alleged reported leaks appear to be inspired by dubious
motives. I cannot confirm such claims. The act is highly condemnable".
He refused to deny or confirm the reports[21]. The Supreme Court
itself condemned the leaking of the SIT report as a 'betrayal of
trust'.[22]

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 7:00 pm
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)

Nowhere else but in Bharat is the word "secular" more misunderstood,
more misapplied and more abused than anywhere else in the world.
Worst, it is simply an anti-Hindu device. I agree with harmony ji;
Hindus need to monitor the activities of seculars, pseudo-seculars
and pseudo-Hindus. Do not trust them, and verify.

No country, no culture, no society is truly secular since
spirituality exists. "Secular" is defined in the manual of words as
"concerned with worldly affairs rather than spiritual ones" (Oxford
American Dictionary).

Jai Maharaj
Jyotishi, Vedic Astrologer

"A king, though endowed with little prowess,
starting on an expedition at the proper time, in
view of the good positions of the planets, achieves
greatness that is eulogised in the scriptures."
- Brhat Samhita, 104.60

Om Shanti

In article <4bae74d4$0$12417$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:
>
> excuse me, but secualrism is not about, never claimed to be about, never was
> intended about, never was about truth, justice or any high moral plane the
> media touts for it.
> here is my premise: a secularist must always be viewed with suspicion until
> his words can be verified indepnedently by the hindus.

> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > Forwarded article
> >
> > Thursday, April 16, 2009
> >
> > Supreme Court's SIT frames charges against Teesta
> >
> > Supreme Court appointed SIT brings out charges against a leading
> > "activist" Teesta Setalvad for "cooking up macabre tales of
> > killings", tutoring witnesses, and concocting horror stories. She has
> > not only done deep disservice to the victims of the Gujarat riots;
> > she has also undermined the credibility of so-called secular
> > interlocutors. It confirms the suspicion many have, that often those
> > speaking in the name of secularism do not subscribe to the very
> > values they claim to be fighting for: truth, justice, impartiality
> > and the rule of law. Their secularism is in the service of beating
> > down opponents rather than discovering the truth.
> >
> > "This story should have been a big front page story. It deserves much
> > more coverage and discussion", says the reporter.
> >
> > Read - An Unconscionable Act
> > http://www.indianexpress.com/news/an-unconscionable-act/447301/0
> >
> > Posted by Jayprakash Acharya
> >
> > End of forwarded article from:
> >
> http://one-news-of-the-day.blogspot.com/2009/04/supreme-courts-sit-frames-cha
> rges.html
> >
> > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > Om Shanti
> >
> > o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> > educational
> > purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may
> > not
> > have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> > poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> > fair use of copyrighted works.
> > o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> > current
> > e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> > o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> > are
> > not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the
> > article.
> >
> > FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> > which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> > owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> > understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> > democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> > that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
> > Title
> > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> > profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
> > included
> > information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> > subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
> > information
> > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> > If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> > your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> > copyright owner.
> >
> > Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> > by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> > this post may be reposted several times.
>
>

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 11:20 pm
From: Mirza Ghalib

On Mar 16, 6:08 pm, use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr.
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> Forwarded article
>
> Thursday, April 16, 2009
>
> Supreme Court's SIT frames charges against Teesta
>
> Supreme Court appointed SIT brings out charges against a leading
> "activist" Teesta Setalvad for "cooking up macabre tales of
> killings", tutoring witnesses, and concocting horror stories. She has
> not only done deep disservice to the victims of the Gujarat riots;
> she has also undermined the credibility of so-called secular
> interlocutors. It confirms the suspicion many have, that often those
> speaking in the name of secularism do not subscribe to the very
> values they claim to be fighting for: truth, justice, impartiality
> and the rule of law. Their secularism is in the service of beating
> down opponents rather than discovering the truth.
>
> "This story should have been a big front page story. It deserves much
> more coverage and discussion", says the reporter.
>
> Read - An Unconscionable Acthttp://www.indianexpress.com/news/an-unconscionable-act/447301/0
>
> Posted by Jayprakash Acharya
>
> End of forwarded article from:http://one-news-of-the-day.blogspot.com/2009/04/supreme-courts-sit-fr...
>
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
>
> o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
> purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
> have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> fair use of copyrighted works.
> o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
> e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
> not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
>
> FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
> 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
> information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
> go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> copyright owner.
>
> Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> this post may be reposted several times.

This (converted) Muslim woman masquerades as Hindu, the
same way one time Sharmila Tagore (now Asghar (or something like
that) Sultana) takes advantage of both worlds. There should be
a law prohibiting converts to use their original name.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Masti and Movies
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/01eeb08f8f937057?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 27 2010 8:48 pm
From: seenu sri

http://manamusicmasti.blogspot.com/2010/01/aadante-adotypu.html

http://manamusicmasti.blogspot.com/2010/01/daagudu-moothalu1964-mp3-songs-download.html

http://manamusicmasti.blogspot.com/2010/01/samudram-1999-mp3-songs-download.html

http://manamusicmasti.blogspot.com/2010/01/family-circus-2003-mp3-songs-download.html

http://manamusicmasti.blogspot.com/2010/01/baala-mithrula-katha-1972-mp3-songs.html

http://tollywoodrock4u.blogspot.com/2010/01/seenu2000-2cd-vcd.html

http://tollywoodrock4u.blogspot.com/2010/01/kiratakudu1985-2cd-vcd.html

http://tollywoodrock4u.blogspot.com/2010/01/maska-2009-400mb-dvdrip-x264-aac.html

http://tollywoodrock4u.blogspot.com/2010/01/pardhu-2008-400mb-dvdrip-x264-aac.html

http://tollywoodrock4u.blogspot.com/2010/01/ashok-2006-dvd9-rip-1-cd-x264-aac-e.html

http://tollywoodrock4u.blogspot.com/2010/01/soori-2000-vcd-untouched.html