http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en
rec.arts.movies.local.indian@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Mamu Nusrat screws Naureen - 10 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/02a5ebc3c7d794d6?hl=en
* SLUMDOG IS ABOUT DEFAMING HINDUS - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/3860c6a75db106e4?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Mamu Nusrat screws Naureen
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/02a5ebc3c7d794d6?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 3 2009 10:55 pm
From: "Kallu Mallu"
<naureen101@aol.com> wrote in message
news:12938770-1160-4651-9226-59e6313960f3@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 3, 1:08�am, Tambi Dude <tambid...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> BTW how did your shit taste when (na)Pak govt had to
>> admit that Kasab was a pakistani and you were forced
>> to eat shit. Do you remember your
>> post when Mumbai attacks happened. You called Kasab
>> an indian hindu.
>>
>> Now go and kiss your teddy bear.
>
> hail to the fascination with shit! Abey kissi choorah ki aulad,
> all I said that Pakistan is not involved in mumbai attackes and
> attackes look like some sangh parivar drama, close to elections.
> I still say, mumbai attacks were your political drama to divert
> international attention from asaam killings and to point one common
> enemy to whole India.A bad Paksiatn is good for " akhand bharat"
> otherwise your castes and ethnicities have tored apart India in many
> states long time ago. Pakistan can gain nothing out of mumbai
> killings. absolutely nothing!
> So what if kasab is from Pakistan, does it mean whole Pakistan and
> pakisatn gov is involved? Your media and political parties have played
> good role in making Pakistan responsible for attacks. Choorah ki
> aulads can't tell the difference between state sponsored acts and
> individually planned operation
> Do you think whole india is involved when in USA, 17 indian nurses
> and 37 IT coolies were busted for having fake degrees. Do you think we
> should deport all indians after few sikhs killed 3 canadians last
> year.
Sounds like "choorah" is some sort of derogatory term. I'll pass on that. I
just got through agreeing with another poster that maybe ganging up on you
was unfair.
This thread has gone from a banal our-women-are-prettier-than-yours argument
to something else. I'll take your word that Pakistani women are prettier
than Indian women. However, it is hard for one to judge beauty of walking
tents, which on occasion might included bearded ladies - (s)he men escaping
from police/army action. :-) Anyway, there are some strange (naïve?)
assertions in your article - assertions, I think, need some corrections.
The conspiracy angle is a nice touch. As much you want to believe that
Pakistan is completely innocent in the recent massacre in Mumbai, I want to
believe that it is not. On the one hand you accuse the Sangh Parivar of
orchestrating the massacre, and on the other, you talk of the Indian state
doing it, simply to divert attention from problems in Assam. Which one is
it? Make up your mind. The Sangh Parivar is not the same as the Indian state
[a concept that might not be immediately apparent to kooks brought up in
Islamic republics]. Or in your humble opinion they are in cahoots? Your
assertion flies in the face of internationally accepted proof. True, the
animals that washed up on Indian shores might be "non-state actors"(i.e.,
they weren't on the Pakistani government payroll and were privately
financed), but they were bred on pure Islamic hatred of all things human,
and that poison is brewed mostly in Pakistan these days. What did the
perpetrators stand to gain? Simple. An all out conflict between India and
Pakistan, would help suicidal animals get power and leverage. That the
Pakistani state would have deniability would be icing on the cake. India and
the international community have shown more than remarkable restraint in the
whole thing, partly being hamstrung by the "war on terror." Pakistan is a
prime example of blackmail.
You then move from a Sangh Parivar-Indian state conspiracy to assert that if
it weren't for Pakistan as a diversion, the Indian state ("Akhand Bharat")
would be "tored apart" [sic] by caste/class conflict. Where do you dream up
this stuff? I don't think Bollywood movies, which by your own admission, you
are "addicted to," would lead you to conclude that. As a rather ordinary
Indian, I say that Pakistan does not occupy my every waking minute. There
are other important things to worry about. But Pakistanis seem to be
obsessed with India and Indians, and will go to all kinds of extremes to
conjure up demented schemes.
Whatever "aulads" Indians are, I don't think there is anything wrong in the
following. Yes, if Kasab is from Pakistan, the Pakistani state is
responsible. Period. This is simply because of dereliction of duty of the
Pakistani state - the state (presumably represented by an elected
government) is unable to put a cork on the poison distilleries within its
borders and ensure peace in the neighborhood. I don't know of any nation on
the planet that has as much expansionist ambition as Pakistan - an ambition
to establish a caliphate from North Africa to Xinjiang. Kashmir is only a
fig leaf for such ambition. Such ambition holds the rest of the world in
contempt, and has no qualms in engaging home-bred brainwashed thugs in
achieving that goal. The claim often is that India has hegemonist designs on
Pakistan. India would be absolutely crazy to take on an additional 200
million Islamic kooks who are afraid of their own shadows.
You end your article with something absolutely dreadful. Fake degrees are
equivalent to premeditated mass murder? Who did the fake degree holders
murder? I don't know what the Sikh reference is all about.
If your interests are Bollywood or the such like, stick to that theme. Don't
dabble in stuff that you have no inkling about.
== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 2:37 am
From: koolfireiv
On Feb 4, 4:16 am, hab...@anony.com (habshi) wrote:
> Kooly lay off Naureen , there are very few women posting here
> anyway because of the cursing and foul language.
> And be a good netter and trim the quotes
Don't pontificate,you jerk,besides scarcity of women or no women
posting here does not depend on anyone,I don't lay off Naureen becoz
you say so,nor is this some movie script,where you yourself decided to
play a moral policing hero and Naureen your
heroine....buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz and off and dont bother me.
== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 2:48 am
From: koolfireiv
On Feb 4, 9:11 am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
> On Feb 3, 3:16 pm, hab...@anony.com (habshi) wrote:
>
> > Kooly lay off Naureen , there are very few women posting here
> > anyway because of the cursing and foul language.
> > And be a good netter and trim the quotes
>
> Out of boredom, Kooly and tambi are on hunting mission. They have no
> life and chase people off on cyber.
owwwwwwwwww so sad,the paki wench is sobbing off to glory,anyone
gotta a rump to spare the bitter feeling,woebegone hag
....only stray dogs and bitches get hunted....to ensure rabies does
not spread in the human population.
== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 2:59 am
From: Mohd Gandu
In article <gmbe5j$3j5$1@news.motzarella.org>, Kallu Mallu says...
>If your interests are Bollywood or the such like,
>stick to that theme. Don't
>dabble in stuff that you have no inkling about.
exactly. she being a low iq idiot should stick to Akshay Kumar
movies and describing how she gets 'wet' looking at him.
== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 6:39 am
From: Mudali
On Feb 2, 11:24 pm, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
> On Feb 2, 4:51 pm, Mudali <mud...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> > So, you agree prostitues in Muslim Pakistan! Thanks!
>
> Wow what an achievement for you! ROTFL.. Abey gadhai ki aulad what is
> that your are trying to say?? Every country in the world is filled
> with prostitutes. Why are you writting about unfortunate women and why
> doess it gives you some sense of achievement.?
>
>
>
> > Isalm treats women as donkeys but Hindus dont. Islamized Hindus in
> > the NORTH India still have cultural problems because of MUSLIM RULE.
> > Muslims support raping six year old girls because Mohamed, the nasty
> > Arab, did it!
>
> And the point you are trying to make here? why are you telling me who
> mohammad married and how old was sita at the time of marriage, pandav
> brothers or if jesus was a bastard? Is this all religion.com. page?
> I posted here because I watch bollywood movies.
>
> > Paki Sharia Court asked a GANG RAPE on a low caste poor Muslim girl.
> > You did not ashamed of the GANG RAPE OF MUSLIM WOMAN!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Who told you if I was not ashamed or ashamed of anything? Banana head,
> do you want me to post hindu girls marrying dogs website. How many
> times do I have to post here that I am an atheist. I don't post on
> religious page but seems like that people like you just want to lynch
> me for being born in a muslim household. Well my father was also an
> atheist , if it gives you some clue.Why you people keep shoving islam
> in my face all the time?
> Now I know how the blacks would have felt 70 years ago and how dalits
> feel today for some scriptures written thousands of years ago.
> I can prolong this idiotic discussion but you are certainly not worth
> of my time.
I heard these replies from Pakis before. You are not an atheist. You
just cry the anti-Indian Pakistani Madrasa propaganda against Hindus!
Your Islamic shit stories are crime always!
When I talked about GANG RAPE of Paki SHARIA court, you are running
like a sleezy dog!
== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 6:41 am
From: Mudali
On Feb 3, 4:08 am, Tambi Dude <tambid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 11:42 pm, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > My parents have raised me very well and it is not your concerns.
>
> we don't see any proof of it in newsgroups.
>
> > >You deride dark skinned people
> > > as something inferior to fair skin. Look at the way you call
> > > Bipasha and Rani as chooras. BTW which indian in newsgroup
> > > use the term choora. None. The only mfs to use that are
> > > pakis like you.
>
> > Truth hurts!
>
> profound wisdom. So Martina Navratilova is better looking
> than Rani or Bipasha because of her color of skin.
>
> > every one looks better than bipasha. Only a monster can appreciate a
> > cockeyed witch faced, faked eyebrows, harsh features, water buffalo
> > bipasha. On the top she is blue, black and purple on lips, knees,
> > belly, elbows and god know where else. Is she a woman?
> > I will commit suicide before being comapred to bipasha.
>
> how do you compare yourself to Martina Navratilova.
>
> > Stop giving yourself too much of a credit. Nobody in Pakistan talks
> > about India. I have read arguments on this website but no where else.
> > Wrong it is not inferiority complex. Getting entertain is an old
> > habbit of muslims. I would not say anything further.
> > Your posts are just a symbol of you newly rich with poor back
> > grounds. You want to flash everything in people face and want them to
> > look at your newly bought clothes ( in this case bollywood).
>
> I watch Pak TV on internet. So I know what I am talking.
> Secondly Pakis watching bollywood is not new. It has been
> on since 1947. In fact until 1965 Indian movies were released
> in Pak. Why don't you get informed for a change. But then I
> guess it is too much to expect from a person who still sleeps
> with teddy bear.
>
> BTW how did your shit taste when (na)Pak govt had to
> admit that Kasab was a pakistani and you were forced
> to eat shit. Do you remember your
> post when Mumbai attacks happened. You called Kasab
> an indian hindu.
>
> Now go and kiss your teddy bear.
Martina is a lesbian.
Further this Naureen is just vomitting the Pakistani Muslim shit
propaganda.
== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 7:17 am
From: hari.kumar@indero.com
"When I talked about GANG RAPE of Paki SHARIA court, you are running
like a sleezy dog!"
Interesting, I remember most recent gang rape of a nun in india with
police ignoring the crime. Do I now hear a dog howling at moon?
== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 6:11 pm
From: Mudali
On Feb 4, 10:17 am, hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
> "When I talked about GANG RAPE of Paki SHARIA court, you are running
> like a sleezy dog!"
>
> Interesting, I remember most recent gang rape of a nun in india with
> police ignoring the crime. Do I now hear a dog howling at moon?
Hey Catholic Asshole!
Hindu religion dont sanction rape but your Catholic Criminal Popes
sanction rape as a tool to destroy women! S/American countries are
still feel the crime of the Catholic Church!
Sharia is part of Islam!
== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 6:13 pm
From: naureen101@aol.com
On Feb 4, 6:39�am, Mudali <mud...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> I heard these replies from Pakis before. You are not an atheist. You
> just cry the anti-Indian Pakistani Madrasa propaganda against Hindus!
> Your Islamic shit stories are crime always!
Choorah ki aulad,
I don't know of any muslim woman who can say that in public. Keep on
barking, it is not in your interest to beleive what I say. The world
is full of criminal soul's like you.
> When I talked about GANG RAPE of Paki SHARIA court, you are running
> like a sleezy dog!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Talk about Yesterday Pubb attacks in mangalore India where hindus
beat , molest and injured women, you seleaze dog. Pay for it right now
and bark aloud just because you are hindu. Bark sleaze dog, let us
kill you ...kutai ki aulad....You caste fanatic hindu chammar. Bark
dog bark, indian women are coming after you to cut you freaks off in
pieces. You should be hang in manglore
== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 6:19 pm
From: naureen101@aol.com
On Feb 4, 2:59�am, Mohd Gandu <mohd.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> exactly. she being a low iq idiot should stick to Akshay Kumar
> movies and describing how she gets 'wet' looking at him.
A front bencher paindoo speakth. Not everyone is like your mother!
==============================================================================
TOPIC: SLUMDOG IS ABOUT DEFAMING HINDUS
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/3860c6a75db106e4?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Feb 4 2009 12:28 pm
From: koolfireiv
On Feb 3, 4:37 am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:36 am, koolfireiv <koolfireii...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What am i trying to convey.. ROFL.....i am pointing to the fact,you
> > are so frigging confused,that you are not even aware,that you were
> > talking shit,before i gave the above link...you are a regular
> > ignoramus.
>
> Kissi gadhay ki aulad! what confusion? what is so special about the
> link?? What kind of interest you think I have in that link? As long as
> American soldiers are not getting hurt, why would I be watching pics
> of wounded Iraqis/ afghans. Are they your brother in law? or pita ji?
Thats like you insisting and implying i calrify your doubt weather i
am your father or your husband....neither of whom i am least intrested
in venturing into,even with a gas mask as protection....ROFL.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.arts.movies.local.indian"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.arts.movies.local.indian+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment