bollywood-holywood: rec.arts.movies.local.indian - 7 new messages in 6 topics

rec.arts.movies.local.indian
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en

rec.arts.movies.local.indian@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* HOT VIDEOS 2 HOT PEOPLE AND ACTRESSES NEVER SEEN PHOTOS - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/1e04cde5e381ecf0?hl=en
* SOUTH INDIAN HOT ACTRESS - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/47e935191a75b799?hl=en
* BANNING 'AARAKSHAN' IS DENIAL OF FREEDOM - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/ce2e28e6095ede10?hl=en
* Miranda Kerr's Latest smoking HOT Lingerie Pictures - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/3b81a3ce8900caa5?hl=en
* 5 KERAL MOVIE ACTRESSES RECONVERT TO HINDU DHARM - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/5c1465028cfcc0e6?hl=en
* HOT VIDEOS FOR YOUTH AND WORLD SEXIEST GIRLS HOT PHOTOS - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/768a3f4489973591?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: HOT VIDEOS 2 HOT PEOPLE AND ACTRESSES NEVER SEEN PHOTOS
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/1e04cde5e381ecf0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Aug 15 2011 5:29 pm
From: 9038 <1jghgcgcc@gmail.com>

A TO Z INFORMATION SEE IN THIS SITE

http://atwoztopic.blogspot.com/

ALL HOT PHOTOS SUPER SEXY PHOTOS

http://alltoux.blogspot.com/2010/09/hot-lip-kiss-135.html

ALL JOBS SITES FREE SEE

http://jobstwo.blogspot.com/

HOT VIDEOS

http://hotvideotoou.blogspot.com/2011/01/kiss-videos.html

hot lip kiss
http://hotvidos.blogspot.com/2010/07/hot-lip-kiss.html
hot kisses
http://hotvidos.blogspot.com/2010/07/hot-kisses.html
hollywood hot videos
http://hotvidos.blogspot.com/2010/07/hollywood-hot-videos.html
real hot videos
http://hotvidos.blogspot.com/2010/07/real-hot-videos.html
tamil hot videos
http://hotvidos.blogspot.com/2010/07/tamil-hot-videos.html

==============================================================================
TOPIC: SOUTH INDIAN HOT ACTRESS
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/47e935191a75b799?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Aug 16 2011 8:14 am
From: SRAVANTHI LOVE

FOR GOOD JOBS SITES TO YOU
http://goodjobssites.blogspot.com/

FOR HOT PHOTO&VIDEOS
HOT SOUTH ACTRESS IN DIFFERENT DRESSES
http://southactresstou.blogspot.com/2011/08/south-actress.html
TRISHA HOT BATHROOM PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/trisha-hot.html
ANUSHKA SHETTY HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/anushka-hot.html
KATRINA KAIF RARE PHOTOS
http://southactresstou.blogspot.com/2011/07/katrina-kaif-wallpapers.html
KAJAL LATEST ROMANTIC STILLS
http://southactresstou.blogspot.com/2011/07/kajal-agarwal-in-naperu-shiva.html
TAMANNA HOT SEXY PHOTOS & VIDEOS
http://southactresstou.blogspot.com/2011/07/tamanna-wallpapers.html
PRANITHA LATEST BEAUTIFUL PHOTOS
http://southactresstou.blogspot.com/2011/06/about-pranitha-praneetha-is-beautiful.html

FOR ONLY HOT GUYS SEE THIS
PRIYAMANI HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/priyamani-hot.html
ARTHI CHABRIA HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/aarti-chabria-hot.html
DIYA MIRZA HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/diya-mirza-hot.html
KATRINA KAIF HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/katrina-kaif-hot.html
DEEPIKA PADUKONE HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/deepika-padukone-hot.html
NAMITHA HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/namitha-hot-photos.html
KAJAL AGARWAL HOT PHOTOS
http://hotactress-kalyani.blogspot.com/2011/08/kajal-agarwal-hot-photos.html

==============================================================================
TOPIC: BANNING 'AARAKSHAN' IS DENIAL OF FREEDOM
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/ce2e28e6095ede10?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Aug 16 2011 10:07 am
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)

Banning Aarakshan is denial of freedom

By Kanchan Gupta
Agenda
The Pioneer
Sunday, August 14, 2011

We are once again witnessing State Governments tripping over each
other to ban a film in the hope of deriving political mileage -- a
hope based on the astounding presumption that the people must be
treated as chattel and denied the freedom to watch films and read
books of their choice lest they be led astray. What is more worrisome
for Governments, both in New Delhi and in the States, is that
allowing unfettered access to books and films runs the risk of
realisation dawning upon the masses that they have been misled into
believing that deliverance lies in blindly following politicians who,
much like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, have been leading us from light
unto darkness.

This article is not being written in praise of Prakash Jha's latest
film, Aarakshan; rarely, if ever, has this columnist offered a
critical view of films, not the least because he is neither a movie
buff nor tutored in the fine art of film criticism. But this article
is definitely in defence of Prakash Jha's right to produce, direct
and screen a film that has been cleared by the Censor Board of India
as is required under the law of the wondrous land in which we live. A
ban on the screening of Aarakshan, even if it is limited to three
States (till now), therefore, reflects callous disregard for the law
and the contempt with which legally established practices are held by
politicians who are too cynical to distinguish right from wrong. It
also stifles, in a certain sense, a wider debate on the policy of
caste-based (or gender-based and religion-based) reservations that
has been thrust upon us by politicians who seek nirvana by following
a path that runs diagonally opposite to the one that was shown by the
Constituent Assembly and charted in the Constitution of India.

It may be politically incorrect to oppose the ban on Aarakshan
imposed by the Governments of Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and
Punjab, but this column has not been known to be politically correct
in the past. Hence, there is every cause to reiterate, unambiguously,
that the ban on this film amounts to gross denial of Prakash Jha's
right to free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of
the Constitution which, we can be quite sure, is an alien and
abhorrent text for our politicians. It is a sad commentary on the
state of freedom in India that such denial should be officially
sanctified on the eve of the nation's 65th Independence Day; we may
be a free nation, but we are yet to achieve freedom of thought and
expression, the right to hold and publicly state an opinion that
could run counter to a prevalent opinion or militate against
conventional (and convenient) wisdom.

It is in this context that the petition filed by Prakash Jha in the
Supreme Court, challenging the ban on his film, gathers greater
importance. The petition rightly "raises an important question of law
as to whether Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India can be
obliterated or trampled upon by State Governments by prohibiting the
exhibition of a film only to support a political view". The Supreme
Court should have taken up the petition for immediate hearing instead
of listing it for next week; lesser and more frivolous causes have
found greater favour with the judiciary in the past.

For not only has the ban on Aarakshan diminished the authority of the
Censor Board of India, it has also repudiated several judgements
setting aside similar politically expedient orders proscribing books
and films. In fact, two separate High Courts have cleared Prakash
Jha's film for screening; their orders stand rudely snubbed. More
specifically, as pointed out by this newspaper, in 1989 the Supreme
Court cleared the screening of a Tamil film that raised discomfiting
questions about the caste-based reservation policy. The court had
then said, "Movie is the legitimate and the most important medium in
which issues of general concern can be treated. The producer may
project his own messages which the others may not approve of. But he
has a right to 'think out' and put the counter appeals to reason. It
is a part of a democratic give-and-take to which no one could
complain. The state cannot prevent open discussion and open
expression, however, hateful to its policies."

But it is not fair to blame authority alone for taking recourse to
proscription to keep books and films out of the public domain. Often
such demands have emanated from specific communities and have been
pandered to. Some years ago this column had commented on how a book,
an essay and a film had run into trouble almost concurrently. The
Bundelas, to use a cliche, were up in arms against London-based
author Jaishree Misra and wanted the Union Government to impose a ban
on her novel, Rani, a fictional account of the life and times of Rani
Lakshmibai published by Penguin. The book was promptly banned in
Uttar Pradesh where politicians, not known for either rectitude or
probity, feigned moral outrage over Jaishree Misra's audacious
suggestion that Rani Lakshmibai, immortalised in folklore as the
chaste and brave Jhansi ki Rani, had an affair with Robert Ellis, the
British political agent. As for the Bundelas, they were further
incensed that the author should have claimed Raja Gangadhar Rao was
impotent. MM Kaye was wise not to identify the dissolute raja in her
bestseller (later made into a blockbuster television serial) The Far
Pavilions, as was JR Ackerley, who displayed amazing inventiveness
while fudging the identity of the degenerate ruler in his Hindoo
Holiday -- An Indian Journal.

The demand to ban Rani, however, was largely peaceful, unlike the
agitation against the inclusion of "Three Hundred Ramayanas: Five
Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation", an essay by AK
Ramanujam, in the recommended reading material for students of
history in Delhi University. Enraged members of the ABVP ransacked
the university's Arts Faculty. The ABVP insisted Ramanujam, an
acclaimed scholar of the Ramayana tradition, had "defamed" Ram. As an
activist put it, "It goes against everything we have been taught as
children. What is the point of applying logic to religion? It is a
matter of faith." Allowing belligerence to get better of reason, the
ABVP activists missed out on two points. First, Ramanujam had
referred to the various Ramayana traditions; rubbishing him and
trashing his essay would mean repudiating the existence of these
traditions. Second, the essay was an academic exploration and had
nothing to do with either religion or logic.

Often our, as also our Government's, response to that which we
perceive to be offensive is no more than knee-jerk reaction. A case
in point is the hostility with which the Rajput Sabha greeted
Ashutosh Gowarikar's film, Jodhaa Akbar. The film was based on an
alleged 'episode' of history, which by all accounts and available
records of the period never really happened. It was a frivolous film
that sought to dazzle viewers rather than recreate Akbar's foray into
Rajputana. But it was up to the people to either watch the film or
give it a pass. Similarly, the choice of watching or boycotting The
Da Vinci Code should have been entirely that of the people; State
Governments had no business to ban the film. Prakash Jha may have
made a film that merits notice, or it could be eminently forgettable.
That, however, is irrelevant. What is relevant is his right to screen
Aarakshan and let people decide its worth or otherwise.

Follow the writer on: http://twitter.com/KanchanGupta
Blog on this and other issues at http://kanchangupta.blogspot.com

Comments:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Madhurendra

By Sindhur on 8/16/2011 7:59:34 PM

Oh Madhurendra,now I understand why Missionaries are flocking to
Punjab..thanks

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AArakshan

By Kumarpushp on 8/15/2011 4:42:55 PM

Dalits from Punjab had demanded the lifting the ban on movie
reservation. Movie on life of Ravidas did not allow by hindus in UP
and in varanashi where Ravi dass was born.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Aarakshan

By Madhurendra on 8/14/2011 8:13:22 PM

Certainly, It is denial of Freedom. Do you know Punjab has lifted the
ban !!!!!!! In Punjab where more than 31 percent of the 2.77 crore
population belongs to the weaker sections, including the Scheduled
Castes. The state government had imposed a ban on the film Thursday
following intelligence reports that it could lead to social
disturbance. The observing committee have even listed the positive
aspects of the film.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Banning Aarakshan is denial of freedom

By Madhurendra on 8/14/2011 8:02:11 PM

Certainly, It is denial of Freedom. Do you know Punjab has lifted the
ban!!!!!!! In Punjab where more than 31 percent of the 2.77 crore
population belongs to the weaker sections, including the Scheduled
Castes. The state government had imposed a ban on the film Thursday
following intelligence reports that it could lead to social
disturbance. The observing committee have even listed the positive
aspects of the film.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Deserves a ban...

By Karthikeyan on 8/14/2011 6:08:15 AM

Movie bored people due to 3 hr length...tried to deal with 2
topics...go if you want to watch 2 movies for price of one...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Freedom of expression is meaningless without consideration to extent
of reach

By Ragu Kattinakere on 8/14/2011 3:22:14 AM

Kanchanji there is a problem with your argument! I have freedom of
speech etc etc but I do not have the reach, for instance, you have.
How do you suggest we deal with who have capacity to influence public
opinion start writing fictions/fantasies irresponsibly or with
ulterior motives? Advertisements are pushed as news, opinion is
pushed as news almost every crap by those who have reach, influence
people. Freedom of expression is meaningless without consideration to
extent of reach.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Views after watching film

By Nikhil Sablania on 8/14/2011 12:37:58 AM

Aarakshan mercilessly exploits prejudices against SC/ST/OBC for
commercial gains. The film crew maintained false notion that it is
about reservation & misguided society into a debate which is not
there in it & created panic. Rather it deals with conflict among
privileged caste Khatriya, Viashya & Brhamin. Such exploitation is
irresponsible from the part of filmmaker, producer & film's unit.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

India is socialist

By Vidur Khanna on 8/14/2011 12:37:34 AM

I would like to say that the amount of influence the Indian state has
on the day to day lives of people is phenomenal. It should be up to
the people to decide the correct amount of influence and the state
has no right to tell them what and what not to watch.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

http://dailypioneer.com/360674/Banning-Aarakshan-is-denial-of-freedom.html

More at:
http://www.dailypioneer.com

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Miranda Kerr's Latest smoking HOT Lingerie Pictures
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/3b81a3ce8900caa5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Aug 16 2011 1:30 pm
From: hot celebrities

check her out and many more celebrities at

http://hot-femalecelebrities-pictures.blogspot.com

==============================================================================
TOPIC: 5 KERAL MOVIE ACTRESSES RECONVERT TO HINDU DHARM
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/5c1465028cfcc0e6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Wed, Aug 10 2011 12:46 pm
From: hari.kumar.co@inderoco.com

Hmm, did they first seek and recieve permission of government for
conversion?

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Aug 16 2011 5:28 pm
From: "analyst41@hotmail.com"

On Aug 10, 3:23 pm, "M. Ranjit Mathews" <ranjit_math...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Aug 10, 11:27 pm, use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr.
>
> Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> > Forwarded post from R.
>
> > 5 Kerala movie-actresses reconvert to Hindu Dharm
>
> Reconvert, eh? Were they Hindus earlier?
>
> Did Stephen Knapp reconvert to Hindu Dharm or did he become a Hindu?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qjv9FD2ugeE
> Why I Became a Hindu / a Krishna Bhakta, by Stephen Knapp‏
>
>
>
> > --- Forwarded Post ---
>
> > From A. on Tuesday, August 9, 2011
>
> > Actress Nayantara Converts to Hinduism
>
> >http://drisyadrisya.blogspot.com/2006/07/mallu-christian-actresses.html
>
> > After Lizzie, Annie, Jomol, Beena Antony the latest edition to the
> > list is Nayantara
>
> >http://kannada.galatta.com/entertainment/kannada/livewire/id/Nayantar...
>
> > Malayalam:
>
> >http://www.mathrubhumi.com/movies/0/206120/
>
> > End of forwarded post from R.
>
> > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > Om Shanti
>
> > o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
> > purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
> > have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
> > poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
> > fair use of copyrighted works.
> > o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
> > e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> > o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
> > not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
>
> > FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
> > which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
> > owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
> > understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
> > democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
> > that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
> > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
> > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
> > profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
> > information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
> > subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
> > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
> > If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
> > your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> > copyright owner.
>
> > Since newsgroup posts are being removed
> > by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
> > this post may be reposted several times.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I think bhaiyyas can achieve {KerlA] or {Keral] but not {KeralA] (we
are ignoring their inability to say [L] for the moment.)

kamalA is [kamlA], achalA is [achlA] etc. but they can say [sabhA] or
[kapilA], or [kalA]. There must be rule lurking somewhere.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: HOT VIDEOS FOR YOUTH AND WORLD SEXIEST GIRLS HOT PHOTOS
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/768a3f4489973591?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Aug 16 2011 5:38 pm
From: 9038 <1jghgcgcc@gmail.com>

A TO Z INFORMATION SEE IN THIS SITE

http://atwoztopic.blogspot.com/

ALL HOT PHOTOS SUPER SEXY PHOTOS

http://alltoux.blogspot.com/2010/09/hot-lip-kiss-135.html

ALL JOBS SITES FREE SEE

http://jobstwo.blogspot.com/

HOT VIDEOS

http://hotvideotoou.blogspot.com/2011/01/kiss-videos.html

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.arts.movies.local.indian"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en