http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en
rec.arts.movies.local.indian@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* SLUMDOG IS ABOUT DEFAMING HINDUS - 15 messages, 8 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/3860c6a75db106e4?hl=en
* Jagte Raho Motilal - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/fe919b1185729f34?hl=en
* AYE MERE VATAN KE LOGO(n) - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/56984cd1d559c87a?hl=en
* Inferiority Complex of Pakistanis - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/02a5ebc3c7d794d6?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: SLUMDOG IS ABOUT DEFAMING HINDUS
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/3860c6a75db106e4?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 15 ==
Date: Fri, Jan 30 2009 10:52 pm
From: naureen101@aol.com
Poverty Poverty !
It is amusing to know that indians are just talking and crying about
poverty shown in the movie and how they were degraded by west. As far
as I remember, poverty scenes were not more than 5 or 7. The whole
movie was based on Child abuse, Child labor, Sexual molestation, sale
of under age girls, corrupt Gov officials etc. Looks like Indians,
have no clue that all the above acts are considered shameless crimes
in the west and are actually more derogatory than poverty. In India
all the above crimes are celebrated and look after. ha ha
Are indians any better than Pakistanis? I guess not. Is India ready to
become a civilized world? not in even next 100 years.
== 2 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 1:41 am
From: Romanise
On Jan 29, 7:53 pm, Carol Kaye <gr...@bass.gov> wrote:
> harmony wrote:
> > bigotry in brown kirastanista like harikumar.
>
> Explain what that means in detail, stump stupid hindu whore.
More likely a eunuch, but then there being a huge demand in whoring
business in Pakistan, any eunuch will do.
== 3 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 3:18 am
From: Primordial Ooze
On Jan 25, 4:41 pm, use...@mantra.com or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai
Maharaj) wrote:
> Slumdog is about defaming Hindus
>
> By Kanchan Gupta
> THE PIONEERhttp://dailypioneer.com
> Sunday, January 25, 2009
>
> In keeping with American politics of the times, Slumdog
> Millionaire has been nominated for as many as 10 Oscars
> and our deracinated media, which constantly looks for
> inspirational 'good news' stories that invariably revolve
> around Western appreciation of 'truthful' portrayal of
> the Indian 'reality', has gone into a tizzy. Saturday's
> edition of a newspaper published from New Delhi had a
> blurb on the front page that read, "The Slumdog story:
> How 'Danny uncle' and his 'moral compass' created the
> biggest 'Indian' blockbuster -- and why you should watch
> it." Predictably, the chattering classes, who had been
> blissfully ignorant of Vikas Swarup's Q and A (as they
> had been of Aravind Adiga's The White Tiger till its
> perverse denigration of India and all things Indian wowed
> the judges of last year's Man Booker prize) are now
> making a beeline for the nearest bookshop for a copy of
> the novel, whose title has been suitably changed to
> Slumdog Millionaire so that the book and the film are
> eponymous and both publisher and producer can encash the
> extraordinary hype that has been generated. Late last
> year, there was similar hoopla over AR Rahman getting the
> Golden Globe award for the music he has scored for
> Slumdog Millionaire. An approving pat on the back by the
> Hollywood Foreign Press Association, it would seem, is
> the most important marker in an artiste's career. Those
> Indian musicians who haven't got the Golden Globe are not
> worthy of honour at home just as Sahitya Akademi award
> winners are not worthy of finding space on our
> bookshelves, leave alone feature on news pages or news
> bulletins.
>
> The larger point is not really about going gaga over an
> American award or a British prize, but how they are seen
> as India being admitted into the charmed circle whose
> membership is strictly controlled and is by invitation
> only. That invitation invariably follows a certain
> pattern; it's not merely the keepers of the gate
> chanting, "Eeny meeny miny mo, catch a tiger by his toe,
> if he hollers let him go…" Apart from the fact that the
> 'tigers' in this case are not hollering but salivating at
> the prospect of seeing themselves clutching a handful of
> trophies on Oscar night, the nomination process is far
> more rigorous than we would think, with filters to keep
> out those films and books that do not serve the judges'
> purpose or pander to their fanciful notions -- in this
> case, of India. Aravind Adiga crafted his novel in a
> manner that it could not but impress the Man Booker
> judges who see India as a seething mass of unwashed
> hordes which worship pagan gods, are trapped in caste-
> based prejudices, indulge in abominable practices like
> untouchability, and are not worthy of being considered as
> an emerging power, never mind economic growth and
> knowledge excellence. Similarly, Danny Boyle has made a
> film that portrays every possible bias against India and
> structured it within the matrix of Western lib-left
> perceptions of the Indian 'reality' which have little or
> nothing in common with the real India in which we live.
>
> Therefore, it is not surprising that Boyle's film is
> about a slum where extreme social exclusion, political
> suppression and economic deprivation define the lives of
> its inhabitants. He has made every effort to shock and
> awe the film's audience by taking recourse to graphic and
> gory portrayal of bloodthirsty Hindu mobs on the rampage
> -- the idiom that defines India as it is imagined by the
> lib-left Western mind -- laying to waste Muslim lives (a
> Hindu is shown slitting a Muslim woman's throat in an
> almost frame-by-frame remake of the videotape that was
> released by the killers of Daniel Pearl) and property.
> There's more that makes you want to throw up the last
> meal you had: Hindu policemen torturing Muslims by giving
> them 'electric shock therapy', street children being
> physically disfigured and then forced to beg, and such
> other scenes of a medieval society where rule of law does
> not exist and every Hindu is a rapacious monster eager to
> make a feast of helpless Muslims.
>
> Nor is it surprising that Boyle should have cunningly
> changed the name of the film's -- as also the book's --
> protagonist from Vikas Swarup's Ram Mohammad Thomas (a
> sort of tribute to the Amar Akbar Antony brand of
> 'secularism' which was fashionable in the 1970s) to Jamal
> Malik. The name implies a Kashmiri connection, and we
> can't put it beyond Boyle suggesting a link between
> Jamal's travails -- it is his mother whose throat is shown
> as being slit by a Hindu -- and the imagined victimhood of
> Kashmir's Muslims who, the lib-left intelligentsia in the
> West insists, are 'persecuted by Hindu India'. Asked
> about the protagonist's name being changed, Swarup is
> believed to have said that it was done to "make it sound
> more politically correct". There is a second hidden
> message: The Hindu quizmaster on the 'Who Wants to be a
> Millionaire?' show has doubts about Jamal, who gets all
> the questions right, not because he is a 'slumdog' but
> because he is a Muslim; so he sets India's Hindu police
> on the hapless boy. Swarup did not quite put it that way
> in his book, but the film does so, and understandably the
> critics in Hollywood who sport Obama buttons are
> impressed.
>
> The last time depravity was portrayed as the Indian
> 'reality' was when Roland Joffé did a cinematic version
> of Dominique Lapierre's City of Joy. In that film, the
> Missionaries of Charity were shown as the saviours of an
> India trapped in filth, squalor, poverty and Hindu
> superstition. Some two decades later, Boyle has
> rediscovered Joffé's India and made appropriate changes
> to fit his film into the Hindu-bad-Muslim-good mould so
> that it has a resonance in today's America where it is
> now fashionable to look at the world through the eyes of
> Barack Hussein Obama.
>
> In her review of the film, "Shocked by Slumdog's poverty
> porn", Alice Miles writes in The Times: "Like the
> bestselling novel by the Americanised Afghan Khaled
> Hosseini, A Thousand Splendid Suns, Slumdog Millionaire
> is not a million miles away from a form of pornographic
> voyeurism. Slumdog Millionaire is poverty porn."
> Commenting on the BBFC's decision to "place this work in
> the comedy genre", she says, "Comedy? So maybe that's it:
> I just didn't get the joke." It's doubtful whether most
> Indians, Hindus and Muslims, would get it either if they
> were to watch Slumdog Millionaire.
>
> More at:http://dailypioneer.com/152164/Slumdog-is-about-defaming-Hindus.html
>
> Jai Maharajhttp://tinyurl.com/a5ljchttp://www.mantra.com/jai
> Om Shanti
>
> Hindu Holocaust Museumhttp://www.mantra.com/holocaust
>
> Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophyhttp://www.hindu.orghttp://www.hindunet.org
>
> The truth about Islam and Muslimshttp://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
>
> o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of
> this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent
> the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law
> and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
> o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> are not necessarily those of the poster.
this is an absurd article. There is much to criticize in this film but
to suggest the western embrassing of the film is because it is pro
Muslim is just naive
== 4 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 4:59 am
From: Tambi Dude
On Jan 31, 1:52 am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
> Poverty Poverty !
> It is amusing to know that indians are just talking and crying about
> poverty shown in the movie and how they were degraded by west. As far
> as I remember, poverty scenes were not more than 5 or 7. The whole
> movie was based on Child abuse, Child labor, Sexual molestation, sale
> of under age girls, corrupt Gov officials etc. Looks like Indians,
> have no clue that all the above acts are considered shameless crimes
> in the west and are actually more derogatory than poverty. In India
> all the above crimes are celebrated and look after. ha ha
> Are indians any better than Pakistanis? I guess not. Is India ready to
> become a civilized world? not in even next 100 years.
Yes Mohatarma Naureen. Pak is as good as India except that
1. Our currency has 50% better value than yours.
2. Our Forex reserves are much more than you. Just two
months ago you were begging for money from other
nations to save yourself from starving.
3. We have a huge manufacturing economy and you
import everything.
Plus in your glee that some indians are protesting over
this movie (jeez, this is a fiction, why are some indians
bending their back on a piece of fiction), you should
note that india has not banned this movie. This movie
was released. Now compare this to islamic countries
where any movies which offends muslims is banned.
BTW your best friend China bans any book or movie
which shows it in bad light.
== 5 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 10:43 am
From: koolfireiv
On Jan 31, 11:52 am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
A mutt-ugly butt faced paki like you,never knew how to distinguish
between Anwar Kharral and Jamal Malik,even if Dev Patel skinned
himself nude,trailer trashed hovel dwelling pakis in America are bred
like that,and what a fine specimen you make....somethings never
change.
== 6 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 12:48 pm
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article <497df257$0$5460$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net>,
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> posted:
>
> India did
> not change much from the days of British Raj.
No Bharat hasn't changed much since then; I personally
witnessed the persecution and slaughter of Hindus there
then, and I hear and read about the persecution and
slaughter of Hindus continues now.
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti
== 7 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 12:59 pm
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article <d8e8cfad-208a-4a26-85f8-ffce80d28926@p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com>,
Mirza Ghalib <mghalib01@yahoo.com> posted:
> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
>
> > Slumdog is about defaming Hindus
> >
> > By Kanchan Gupta
> > THE PIONEERhttp://dailypioneer.com
> > Sunday, January 25, 2009
> >
> > In keeping with American politics of the times, Slumdog
> > Millionaire has been nominated for as many as 10 Oscars
> But Dr. Maharaj, the central character in the film
> carries the name Jamal Malik, which is a Muslim
> name. So at best you can say it defames Indians,
> not only Hindus.
>
> Incidentally, the condition of the dwellers in Dharavi
> where this movie was shot is far better than of some
> living in rural areas of India and subject to the same
> feudal exploitation as in British times. Sad to say,
> the movie is not far from the reality.
>
> Although I do not intend to see this movie, hope
> it sends a kick in the ass to the Indian Government,
> who have been promising for the last 60 years
> "good times just around the corner".
Excerpt from The Guardian, UK:
"They changed the title from Q&A to Slumdog Millionaire.
("That made a lot of sense," says Swarup.) They changed the
ending. ("Danny thought the hero should be arrested on
suspicion of cheating on the penultimate question, not
after he wins as I had it. That was a successful idea.")
They made friends into brothers, axed Bollywood stars and
Mumbai hoodlums and left thrilling subplots on the cutting-
room floor. Crucially, they changed the lead character's
name from Ram Mohammad Thomas to Jamal Malik, thereby
losing Swarup's notion that his hero would be an Indian
everyman, one who sounded as though he was Hindu, Muslim
and Christian. Instead, they made Jamal a Muslim whose
mother is killed by a Hindu mob. ("It's more dramatically
focused as a result, perhaps more politically correct.")
"I was forewarned of the changes by Simon Beaufoy,
the screenwriter," Swarup says. . . .
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/jan/16/danny-boyle-india
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti
== 8 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 1:05 pm
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article <jrOdncDtYJUV4uDUnZ2dnUVZ_hcLAAAA@giganews.com>,
Rich <none@nowhere.com> posted:
> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
>
> > Slumdog is about defaming Hindus
> >
> > By Kanchan Gupta
> > THE PIONEER
> > http://dailypioneer.com
> > Sunday, January 25, 2009
> >
> > In keeping with American politics of the times, Slumdog
> > Millionaire has been nominated for as many as 10 Oscars
> > and our deracinated media, which constantly looks for
> > inspirational 'good news' stories that invariably revolve
> > around Western appreciation of 'truthful' portrayal of
> > the Indian 'reality', has gone into a tizzy. Saturday's
> > edition of a newspaper published from New Delhi had a
> > blurb on the front page that read, "The Slumdog story:
> > How 'Danny uncle' and his 'moral compass' created the
> > biggest 'Indian' blockbuster -- and why you should watch
> > it." Predictably, the chattering classes,
> Forget the populist movie. India's main problem is that its feral
> culture of an entire population devoted to scavenging a living has to
> change now that real economic advancement has finally arrived. In other
> words, no one wants to watch someone who earns $75,000/yr dicker with
> someone over the final cost of a $3.00 ice cream cone. Don't laugh,
> I've seen this happen. It's middle-class living with a serf-class
> mindset.
Yes, don't laugh: millionaires -- both there and here in
the US -- haggle over the small price I charge for my
services, for instance.
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti
== 9 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 1:11 pm
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
In article <8b9dc45a-7051-4065-b231-2756f5957bb0@s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Primordial Ooze <jmnatch@gmail.com> posted:
>
> this is an absurd article. There is much to criticize in this film but
> to suggest the western embrassing of the film is because it is pro
> Muslim is just naive
Here's a comment that appears below the original article
at The Pioneer:
Kanchan's "slumanalysis"
By PK on 1/30/2009 2:13:38 PM
Hats off to Kanchan to make this analysis. I would go
further in the subliminal messages smartly radiated by
diabolical directors of late. Watching the SDC movie, I was
horrified scene after scene. To make the message crystal
clear, they have not spared the women either. While Jamal
and Salim are evidently Muslims, Latika, a Hindu name is
deliberately inserted to have vicarious thrill of Muslim
underdog brothers raping and screwing Hindu girl.
More here:
http://dailypioneer.com/152164/Slumdog-is-about-defaming-Hindus.html
Facts about terrorist Islam and Muslims:
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti
> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
>
> > Slumdog is about defaming Hindus
> >
> > By Kanchan Gupta
> > THE PIONEERhttp://dailypioneer.com
> > Sunday, January 25, 2009
> >
> > In keeping with American politics of the times, Slumdog
> > Millionaire has been nominated for as many as 10 Oscars
> > and our deracinated media, which constantly looks for
> > inspirational 'good news' stories that invariably revolve
> > around Western appreciation of 'truthful' portrayal of
> > the Indian 'reality', has gone into a tizzy. Saturday's
> > edition of a newspaper published from New Delhi had a
> > blurb on the front page that read, "The Slumdog story:
> > How 'Danny uncle' and his 'moral compass' created the
> > biggest 'Indian' blockbuster -- and why you should watch
> > it." Predictably, the chattering classes, who had been
> > blissfully ignorant of Vikas Swarup's Q and A (as they
> > had been of Aravind Adiga's The White Tiger till its
> > perverse denigration of India and all things Indian wowed
> > the judges of last year's Man Booker prize) are now
> > making a beeline for the nearest bookshop for a copy of
> > the novel, whose title has been suitably changed to
> > Slumdog Millionaire so that the book and the film are
> > eponymous and both publisher and producer can encash the
> > extraordinary hype that has been generated. Late last
> > year, there was similar hoopla over AR Rahman getting the
> > Golden Globe award for the music he has scored for
> > Slumdog Millionaire. An approving pat on the back by the
> > Hollywood Foreign Press Association, it would seem, is
> > the most important marker in an artiste's career. Those
> > Indian musicians who haven't got the Golden Globe are not
> > worthy of honour at home just as Sahitya Akademi award
> > winners are not worthy of finding space on our
> > bookshelves, leave alone feature on news pages or news
> > bulletins.
> >
> > The larger point is not really about going gaga over an
> > American award or a British prize, but how they are seen
> > as India being admitted into the charmed circle whose
> > membership is strictly controlled and is by invitation
> > only. That invitation invariably follows a certain
> > pattern; it's not merely the keepers of the gate
> > chanting, "Eeny meeny miny mo, catch a tiger by his toe,
> > if he hollers let him go=85" Apart from the fact that the
> > 'tigers' in this case are not hollering but salivating at
> > the prospect of seeing themselves clutching a handful of
> > trophies on Oscar night, the nomination process is far
> > more rigorous than we would think, with filters to keep
> > out those films and books that do not serve the judges'
> > purpose or pander to their fanciful notions -- in this
> > case, of India. Aravind Adiga crafted his novel in a
> > manner that it could not but impress the Man Booker
> > judges who see India as a seething mass of unwashed
> > hordes which worship pagan gods, are trapped in caste-
> > based prejudices, indulge in abominable practices like
> > untouchability, and are not worthy of being considered as
> > an emerging power, never mind economic growth and
> > knowledge excellence. Similarly, Danny Boyle has made a
> > film that portrays every possible bias against India and
> > structured it within the matrix of Western lib-left
> > perceptions of the Indian 'reality' which have little or
> > nothing in common with the real India in which we live.
> >
> > Therefore, it is not surprising that Boyle's film is
> > about a slum where extreme social exclusion, political
> > suppression and economic deprivation define the lives of
> > its inhabitants. He has made every effort to shock and
> > awe the film's audience by taking recourse to graphic and
> > gory portrayal of bloodthirsty Hindu mobs on the rampage
> > -- the idiom that defines India as it is imagined by the
> > lib-left Western mind -- laying to waste Muslim lives (a
> > Hindu is shown slitting a Muslim woman's throat in an
> > almost frame-by-frame remake of the videotape that was
> > released by the killers of Daniel Pearl) and property.
> > There's more that makes you want to throw up the last
> > meal you had: Hindu policemen torturing Muslims by giving
> > them 'electric shock therapy', street children being
> > physically disfigured and then forced to beg, and such
> > other scenes of a medieval society where rule of law does
> > not exist and every Hindu is a rapacious monster eager to
> > make a feast of helpless Muslims.
> >
> > Nor is it surprising that Boyle should have cunningly
> > changed the name of the film's -- as also the book's --
> > protagonist from Vikas Swarup's Ram Mohammad Thomas (a
> > sort of tribute to the Amar Akbar Antony brand of
> > 'secularism' which was fashionable in the 1970s) to Jamal
> > Malik. The name implies a Kashmiri connection, and we
> > can't put it beyond Boyle suggesting a link between
> > Jamal's travails -- it is his mother whose throat is shown
> > as being slit by a Hindu -- and the imagined victimhood of
> > Kashmir's Muslims who, the lib-left intelligentsia in the
> > West insists, are 'persecuted by Hindu India'. Asked
> > about the protagonist's name being changed, Swarup is
> > believed to have said that it was done to "make it sound
> > more politically correct". There is a second hidden
> > message: The Hindu quizmaster on the 'Who Wants to be a
> > Millionaire?' show has doubts about Jamal, who gets all
> > the questions right, not because he is a 'slumdog' but
> > because he is a Muslim; so he sets India's Hindu police
> > on the hapless boy. Swarup did not quite put it that way
> > in his book, but the film does so, and understandably the
> > critics in Hollywood who sport Obama buttons are
> > impressed.
> >
> > The last time depravity was portrayed as the Indian
> > 'reality' was when Roland Joff=E9 did a cinematic version
> > of Dominique Lapierre's City of Joy. In that film, the
> > Missionaries of Charity were shown as the saviours of an
> > India trapped in filth, squalor, poverty and Hindu
> > superstition. Some two decades later, Boyle has
> > rediscovered Joff=E9's India and made appropriate changes
> > to fit his film into the Hindu-bad-Muslim-good mould so
> > that it has a resonance in today's America where it is
> > now fashionable to look at the world through the eyes of
> > Barack Hussein Obama.
> >
> > In her review of the film, "Shocked by Slumdog's poverty
> > porn", Alice Miles writes in The Times: "Like the
> > bestselling novel by the Americanised Afghan Khaled
> > Hosseini, A Thousand Splendid Suns, Slumdog Millionaire
> > is not a million miles away from a form of pornographic
> > voyeurism. Slumdog Millionaire is poverty porn."
> > Commenting on the BBFC's decision to "place this work in
> > the comedy genre", she says, "Comedy? So maybe that's it:
> > I just didn't get the joke." It's doubtful whether most
> > Indians, Hindus and Muslims, would get it either if they
> > were to watch Slumdog Millionaire.
> >
> > More at:http://dailypioneer.com/152164/Slumdog-is-about-defaming-Hindus.html
== 10 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 1:39 pm
From: naureen101@aol.com
On Jan 31, 4:59�am, Tambi Dude <tambid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 1:52�am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Poverty Poverty !
> > It is amusing to know that indians are just talking and crying about
> > poverty shown in the movie and how they were degraded by west. As far
> > as I remember, poverty scenes were not more than 5 or 7. The whole
> > movie was based on Child abuse, Child labor, Sexual molestation, sale
> > of under age girls, corrupt Gov officials etc. Looks like Indians,
> > have no clue that all the above acts are considered shameless crimes
> > in the west and are actually more derogatory than poverty. In India
> > all the above crimes are celebrated and look after. ha ha
> > Are indians any better than Pakistanis? I guess not. Is India ready to
> > become a civilized world? not in even next 100 years.
>
> Yes Mohatarma Naureen. Pak is as good as India except that
>
> 1. Our currency has 50% better value than yours.
> 2. Our Forex reserves are much more than you.
snip snip ROTFL...paisa.. paisa.. paisa..roti ...roti ...bhaji..
bhaji ... speaketh like a true poor slum deweller. As they say, you
can take out poor from poverty but can never take out poverty from a
poor .
== 11 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 1:45 pm
From: naureen101@aol.com
> BTW your best friend China bans any book or movie
> which shows it in bad light.
Correction, my best freind is not China. My best friend is a red neck
Texas cow boy. We will beat China in this century and many more to
come. Inshallah !
As far India is concerned it doesn't stand any chances of becoming a
super power. More Inshallah!
== 12 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 2:59 pm
From: hari.kumar@indero.com
> India did
> not change much from the days of British Raj.
"No Bharat hasn't changed much since then; I personally witnessed the
persecution and slaughter of Hindus there then, and I hear and read
about the persecution and slaughter of Hindus continues now."
Jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. must think real indians fools.
Among other foot prints he has left on the internet record is his
declared birthdate which he provided for purposes of astrology
discussion.
How does someone born in 1946 witness anything about british rule?
They don't, he is caught once more in his web of lies.
He is a lifelong resident of amrica and citizen whose heritage is from
europe. He is a life long resident and citizen of america and his ethnic
heritage is from europe.
He speaks no language of india but english and refuses
to accept a call from a real indian to avoid this lie.
His "dr." and indian sounding name were chosen to bring customers to his
astrology business.
He is a white bigot.
== 13 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 5:20 pm
From: The Starmaker
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
>
> In article <jrOdncDtYJUV4uDUnZ2dnUVZ_hcLAAAA@giganews.com>,
> Rich <none@nowhere.com> posted:
>
> > http://www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
> >
> > > Slumdog is about defaming Hindus
> > >
> > > By Kanchan Gupta
> > > THE PIONEER
> > > http://dailypioneer.com
> > > Sunday, January 25, 2009
> > >
> > > In keeping with American politics of the times, Slumdog
> > > Millionaire has been nominated for as many as 10 Oscars
> > > and our deracinated media, which constantly looks for
> > > inspirational 'good news' stories that invariably revolve
> > > around Western appreciation of 'truthful' portrayal of
> > > the Indian 'reality', has gone into a tizzy. Saturday's
> > > edition of a newspaper published from New Delhi had a
> > > blurb on the front page that read, "The Slumdog story:
> > > How 'Danny uncle' and his 'moral compass' created the
> > > biggest 'Indian' blockbuster -- and why you should watch
> > > it." Predictably, the chattering classes,
>
> > Forget the populist movie. India's main problem is that its feral
> > culture of an entire population devoted to scavenging a living has to
> > change now that real economic advancement has finally arrived. In other
> > words, no one wants to watch someone who earns $75,000/yr dicker with
> > someone over the final cost of a $3.00 ice cream cone. Don't laugh,
> > I've seen this happen. It's middle-class living with a serf-class
> > mindset.
>
> Yes, don't laugh: millionaires -- both there and here in
> the US -- haggle over the small price I charge for my
> services, for instance.
you sell your booty?
== 14 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 9:10 pm
From: The Starmaker
hari.kumar@indero.com wrote:
>
> > India did
> > not change much from the days of British Raj.
>
> "No Bharat hasn't changed much since then; I personally witnessed the
> persecution and slaughter of Hindus there then, and I hear and read
> about the persecution and slaughter of Hindus continues now."
>
> Jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. must think real indians fools.
>
> Among other foot prints he has left on the internet record is his
> declared birthdate which he provided for purposes of astrology
> discussion.
>
> How does someone born in 1946 witness anything about british rule?
>
> They don't, he is caught once more in his web of lies.
>
> He is a lifelong resident of amrica and citizen whose heritage is from
>
> europe. He is a life long resident and citizen of america and his ethnic
> heritage is from europe.
>
> He speaks no language of india but english and refuses
> to accept a call from a real indian to avoid this lie.
>
> His "dr." and indian sounding name were chosen to bring customers to his
> astrology business.
>
> He is a white bigot.
astrology business? I thought he was selling his booty!
Besides, Bollywood made a mistake with that title of the movie.
Hollywood loves to promote negative sterotypes.
Hollywood would love to promote movies with titles like
Slumdog Millionaire
or
Nigger Millionaire
or
Wetback Millioniare
They certaintly would never come up with a title like "Kike
Millionaire"!
And they certaintly would not call that "defaming"...
The Starmaker
== 15 of 15 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 9:39 pm
From: koolfireiv
On Feb 1, 2:39 am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
Jeez get yourself a education or worse you were deprived of proper
nutrition,you just wrote something so stupid, and its typical of piss
poor pakis in despair,what you have is impaired prefrontal cortex
activity.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Jagte Raho Motilal
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/fe919b1185729f34?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 12:58 am
From: Romanise
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBgmwyVbiBI&feature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jc2NyqaHC1A&feature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=366wgHkBky4&feature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a9DA5XYWwY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAH1Znb64Zs&feature
==============================================================================
TOPIC: AYE MERE VATAN KE LOGO(n)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/56984cd1d559c87a?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 12:43 pm
From: usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
You may not like it, as you write below, but you know how
it is: actors and performers usually get credited with the
lines they speak in films or the songs they sing. If more
people think "someone wrote that" when they watch films and
TV shows, and listen to music, then writers will receive
the appropriate attention that we would like.
Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti
In article <768fa2d1-6da8-45b6-81b5-08b1d9f155be@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
Akkordeon <chandu.kale@gmail.com> posted:
>
> I don't like the way everyone goes on crediting this song to Lata. It
> is, first and foremost, C Ramchandra's song.
> It was his idea to present a song. He roped in Kavi Pradeep, who wrote
> something like 120 verses. Anna (=3D CR) abridged them to 4, set them to
> tune and asked Asha to sing it. Asha underwent umpteen rehearsals.
> When Lata got to know that this would be presented before Pandit
> Nehru, she pestered Asha to ask CR to allow her to sing too. Then she
> gradually egged out Asha (by virtually ordering her to tell Ram that
> she is not well and cannot sing) and sang the song herself, while
> otherwise trashing CR when it came to film songs.
> And now she goes about repeating how she sang and Pt Nehru wept.
> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish (Dr. Jai Maharaj) posted:
>
> > I remember when the wole country went into a trance
> > when Lata ji sang this:
> >
> > http://mere--words.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Jai Maharajhttp://tinyurl.com/a5ljchttp://www.mantra.com/jai
> > Om Shanti
>
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 12:54 pm
From: hari.kumar@indero.com
"TV shows, and listen to music, then writers will receive
the appropriate attention that we would like."
Jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc. along with his lies that he is indian, that
he speaks
other then english of indian languages and that his "dr." and name are
not his inventions; claims to be a writer of scripts which have been
produced. He might have written scripts, thousands of people have, but
we can agree that given his life of lies he still has them and has not
even had one accepted let alone produced.
He is a white bigot.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Inferiority Complex of Pakistanis
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/t/02a5ebc3c7d794d6?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 31 2009 8:32 pm
From: naureen101@aol.com
On Jan 13, 2:06�am, koolfireiv <koolfireii...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 6:27�am, naureen...@aol.com wrote:
>
> The problem with you are like most pakis,you are in the midst of
> historical cross roads of cultural confusion,you have an identity only
> as recently as the 60 years back,not good enough to back up your
> Jeni ass sounding harangue,for heavens sake what is mentally low
> class,knowing to talk English,and writing in English is not the
> same,you have a serious disconnect problem,why or what is meant by you
> harking �about the joys of Indians not happy with pakis seeing Hindi
> movies, we don't approve of double standards and being in a cog in a
> business family it makes sense for me that the pakis see Hindi
> movies,after seeing it don't come hollering about paki and Indians on
> the cultural divide....Paki men are as god or as ugly as any one,and
> paki girls are as good or as bad as any other girl,you want to feel
> advantaged by any genetic advantage of being half Hindu paki,who are
> the progeny of sulla havaldhars rape during their wars with India,that
> is comical,becoz till the eve of independence you were on Indian
> territory,and low and behold the next strike of 12 0 clock,you became
> a Pakistani,as Jinnah decreed.
>
> Even if you have brown hair,green eyes,and brown or anemic skin,and
> claim that you are �popping somewhere in the frontier province of ex-
> India, it will not make you pretty,you could still look like a
> bedraggled ugly witch,with a skin texture of dry garss and desert
> sand,none of these factors contribute or defines beauty, but body
> symmetry read this,if you have the ability to buy,.The Divine
> Proportion: A Study in Mathematical Beauty..http://books.google.co.in/
> books?hl=en&lr=&id=rF0cj1I5KQcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=scientific+study+of
> +beauty+definition&ots=YcqeqMrFdL&sig=-GxeDmvG2u4cOX0J0uFw3yJmiWw.
> It will throw your conviction of paki women being more beautiful than
> Indian women,out in the dustbin,if you insist every Indian guy should
> gets an erection seeing Pakistani women,or if you think wrongly that
> you want to be categorized beautiful....not happening....if a
> distinction hypothetically however vague, can be established
> connecting beauty,with the crap you are contributing on the forum,you
> will be as ugly as sin itself or something close to be called Jezebel
> the harlot....your constant limp assertions, claims about Indian women
> are ugly is rather stupid,you being in America,gives you no
> advantage....Whoopi Goldberg is an American too,she is an actress to
> boot,and a actor of commendable fortitude,grace, assertion,poise and
> ability,i can assume you as a paki is half as good looking as
> her....In the movie Cleopatra,going by your beautiful paki women
> theory,i am wondering what if Elizabeth Taylor was not chosen by 20th
> century fox and director Joseph L. Mankiewicz,for the so called
> beautiful Pakistani women from the frontier province or a Punjabi kudi
> to do her role, demurely built as they are like AL-Khalid tanks,and a
> posterior of a rickety double Decker bus or just like a off white,8
> foot Wanton Wanda gyrating, as if all parts are to be re fixed after
> her performance.and boy what a charming smile she had,would put Arnie
> in California to shame.
>
> Hera mandi mujras are made for rickshaw drivers of Pakistan,whats
> wrong with them,whats wrong with you,how many rickshaw drivers have
> Pentium computers in pak,to watch u tube movies.you are rock solid
> dumb,it would do you good if you stay away from topics like
> beauty,charm,looks,grace,strenth,allure,drop dead
> beautiful,attractive,sweet and concentrate on you Pakistani Mujra
> routines at home,it keeps you safely within your
> limits,abilities,culture, livelihood and qom befitting your family
> Pakistani status.think and answer however difficult that maybe.
Kooly, get a life. I hope it is not too late for you. I suggest
marriage for your cure, if you can find some retarded looser
pleeeeease get marry and spare us from five page nonsense. Do you
think people have time to read your rantings.
At least take some communication lessons from Mr rizvi. His few liners
explodes like grenades on enemy face. You on the other hand is a lost
paindoo donkey!
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.arts.movies.local.indian"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.arts.movies.local.indian+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.movies.local.indian/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment